Jesus Is High Priest

Greetings at the sermon from The Chapter!

 

The paternal line of Jesus is divine, of the Father, and his maternal line is priestly, of Mary the Blessed Virgin.
John the Baptist is also of the priestly line.

 

Origins of Jesus Son of Man

The Son of God was conceived in the Holy Spirit within the womb of the Blessed Virgin.

He was born unto the House of King David, who is of the tribe of Judah, for Joseph, Mary's husband, is from David's line.

Jesus, therefore, was not born of David as a descendant, but into his tribe and family through divine origin.

 

As for the Virgin Mary, there is no reference in the New Testament that she descends from the tribe of Judah. The only indication as to her family origins is that she is a relative of Elizabeth, the mother of John the Baptist.

The parents of John the Baptist are Zechariah and Elizabeth, and both are of the priestly tribe of Levi. Neither of them are Jews (of the tribe of Judah).

So John the Baptist is not a Jew (of Judah), but a Levite (of Levi).

 

Priesthood Through the Virgin Mary

It is a safe assumption to state that the Virgin Mary also belongs to the tribe of Levi, and that Jesus descends from the priestly tribe of the Levites.

It is through being born in the Spirit into the house of David of the tribe of Judah that Jesus is King, and through being born of the Virgin Mary that Jesus is High Priest, for only the Levites could be priests.

So Jesus, as Son of Man, does not descend from the Jews, but from the Levites. Thus he is Messiah High Priest through his Mother Mary.

 

The Priesthood of Jesus is also confirmed by way of Melchizedek, a priest of God Most High who brought bread and wine and blessed Abram and blessed God Most High (the Father).

Melchizedek was king of Salem, and at the same time he was the high priest of God the Father. He is a prophetic revelation of Jesus, God's Son, who is both Messiah King and Messiah High Priest.

 

Jesus High Priest of the English Church

Under English Law, as Jesus is High Priest - and therefore head and supreme governor - of the English Church, he is also entitled to be King of England.

 

The English Church was founded in Kent and in Northumbria around 1,000 years before Henry VIII.

 

The Holy Trinity

From the Ecumenical Chapter of Our Fair Lady Britannia.

 

Hail Britannia's Army!

 

Our first edition from the Chapter is dedicated to the Holy Trinity as presented in the Book of Genesis, very first chapter, verse 26.

Genesis, 1:26

And God said: let us create man in our likeness, in our resemblance.

 

God, when deciding to create Man, spoke in the first person plural, as we can see from the Hebrew script in the Old Testament (Hebrew is written and read from right to left):

 

נַעֲשֶׂ ה: is a verb in the future tense translating: we shall make;

 

אָ דָ ם: a noun meaning Man;

 

בְּ צַ לְ מֵ נו: in is a preposition expressed with B (בְּ) followed by likeness-of-us, which is expressed as one word, including the initial בְּ (in);

 

כִּ דְ מוּתֵ נו: as is a preposition expressed with K (כִּ) followed by resemblance-of-us, expressed as one word, including the initial כִּ (as).

 

We shall make man in likeness of us, as resemblance of us.

 

As we can see, the Hebrew text uses the first person plural to describe the divine act of Creation, as God the Father was not alone in carrying out the Creation of Adam, the first human being.

 

Our Faith is Trinitarian, and our British Mother In High, Britannia, is the Third Person of the Holy Trinity.

Jesus the Son is the Second Person.

The Father is the First Person.

 

The Maternal Spirit does not come to the Folk as foreign, but in the resemblance of the Folk, and speaking in their own language.

God created Man in His own resemblance. He was not alone in this.

 

The King of England

King John

In May 1213, King John surrendered the Crown of England to the Pope in the presence of the papal envoy Pandulph. The Pope, Innocent III - and later each of his successors after him - became the suzerain of England and of all possessions under the English Crown.

 

How do we know that this actually happened and is not a myth?

Because it was well documented in official acts, and in 1365, Parliament officially debated the surrender of the English Realm by King John to the Pope, some 152 years after the event took place.

So, as we can see, there are official State documents proving that the surrender of the English Crown did happen.

 

In June 1215, King John was forced into signing the Magna Carta, and this was in breach of papal authority over England.

Two months later, in August 1215, Pope Innocent III annulled the Magna Carta.

 

Binding Legacy

King John's successors were bound into upholding the obligations deriving from the surrender of the English Crown to papal supremacy:

 

" we bind ourselves and our successors not to act counter to them. And if we or any one of our successors shall presume to attempt this, whoever he be, unless being duly warned he come to his kingdom, and his senses, he shall lose his right to the kingdom, and this charter of our obligation and concession shall always remain firm."

 

Henry VIII is a descendant of King John, and Elizabeth Windsor is a direct descendant of King John.

And so Henry VIII lost his right to the English Throne when he rebelled against papal sovereignty and sought to replace this with his own sovereignty.

 

Sovereign English Crown

In order for the English Crown to be sovereign, papal authority would need to be exposed as spiritually null and void, and Jesus Son of God would need to be proclaimed as sole Head of the English Church.

 

These two requirements would imply:

1) the end of the line of popes,

2) the end of the current Establishment.

Under English Law, as Head of the English Church, Jesus Son of God would also be King of England.

 

There are three places that have been mentioned as the site where the act of submission of the English Realm in May 1213 happened:

1) Dover Castle.

2) Temple Ewell, a parish in Dover District and whose name derives from the Knights Templar.

3) A round church of the Knights Templar on Western Heights, Dover, whose foundations were discovered towards the end of the 18th century and can be seen today.

 

Deus Lo Vult

The Knights Templar

The Order of the Knights Templar was founded in the decades following the conquest of Jerusalem by the Crusaders, which came about in Anno Domini 1099.

 

This conquest enabled the foundation of the Kingdom of Jerusalem, and it was on the Temple Mount that the Knights Templar had their headquarters, with the mission to protect pilgrims visiting the sanctuaries they considered holy.

 

The Templars believed that the Temple of King Solomon had been situated there, beneath the Al Aqsa mosque.

However, they soon came to realise that God had not preserved this temple, and so they began establishing estates throughout England and Europe, and these were collectively known as the Temple.

Property and estates belonging to the Templars included churches, fortifications, farms and workshops.

 

Letters of Credit

The Knights Templar also established the use of letters of credit, which enabled pilgrims to deposit money or other value within the Temple in their area and use the letter they received to retrieve a corresponding value of money from the Temple in the area to which they had made their pilgrimage.

 

This practice made it possible for people to avoid taking all their money with them on the long journey and thus made them less vulnerable to attack.

This same practice was later to be used in trade by merchants travelling long distances from one town to another: once they had sold their merchandise, they could receive a letter of credit that could be cashed in on their return home.

This was essentially the beginning of modern banking.

 

The Templars and the English Monarchy

It was within a round church of the Knights Templar in Dover that King John handed over the English Crown to the Pope's envoy and received it back from him as a papal fiefdom.

King John bound all his successors to adhere to this contract of papal fiefdom.

Henry VIII broke this contract when he rebelled against papal authority and, technically, he lost his right to the English Throne.

 

We owe to the Knights Templar their recognising of the fact that the Temple of Solomon no longer existed in Jerusalem, and the subsequent establishment of The Temple wherever they set up their estates.

 

Technically, the Knights Templar established the principle that the Holy Land is wherever we decide to dedicate our efforts to economic prosperity, and NOT in the land of Palestine on the former Temple Mount, where NO temple of Solomon exists.

 

We also owe to the Knights Templar the technical nullity of Henry VIII's claim to the English Throne once he had broken with the Pope.

 

England: Deus Lo Vult!

What Is True Socialism?

Original Socialism

In its origins, Socialism was a movement among workers in factories and in mines that started in the nineteenth century during the Industrial Revolution. 
People wished to work acceptable shifts, not 14 hours a day, six days a week. They wished to have an income that would be sufficient to live decently on. They sought to have a guarantee for work-related accidents and for lost employment due to sickness.

The unions managed to gradually bring about many of the original aims of Socialism and people were able to work acceptable shifts that enabled them to look after their family and even purchase a house.

The End of Social Values

Socialist values have been swept away under the European Union, starting with the Common Market.
In the 1970s, the UK government introduced a policy of encouraging factories in Britain to close down and to take up production in the Far East of Asia, to then import the products to Britain at fractional prices.

Starting around 2004, Britain's doors were opened to a mass invasion of eastern European workers who would work for the minimum UK wage and earn around five times more than they would in their own country for the same work, once the value of their wages in pound sterling was calculated in their home currency.

In exchange for this advantage, they were mass recruited in eastern Europe by work agencies on zero-hour contracts.
This meant that they could be laid off at any given moment without explanation, and they would in any case be paid only for the hours they worked. There would be no sickness payments, no holiday pay, no right to union membership.

As a result, even if a worker from eastern Europe managed to hold out for two or three months in England doing shifts in factories or on farms before being laid off, they'd have earned the same as they would have in their own country in a whole year - or even longer.

The Work Agency System Continues

Around the start of the year 2014, Romania and Bulgaria were added to the list of eastern European countries that could flood Britain with masses of workers.
In Romania and Bulgaria, a house for sale in good condition and with adjacent land starts at less than £2,000, and the average minimum wage (although not legally defined in these two countries contrary to Britain) is around 150 to 170 euro a month, which is the equivalent to about 120 to 135 pound sterling.

So now we have a mass influx of mostly Romanians coming to England, competing with the Poles and Lithuanians and Latvians.
And so the cycle goes on.

National Socialism

It is clear to see that true Socialism is National Socialism, because it goes back to the original ideals of the social contract, which is that work should be available for the local population in any given area at a decent wage and with a guarantee to holiday money and to payment in case of sickness and work-related accidents.

The idea that a population in a country should have the work denied and simply sit around while people from other countries flock over and get the jobs owing to their superior motivation - because they are earning many times more than in their own country - is as far away from Socialism as the devil is from truth.

Social ideals only ever have a sense when the Folk is sovereign in its own land. Once this essential right is taken away, the greedy and lazy elites will have a field day destroying a nation and replacing it with highly motivated cheap labourers.
All for their own greedy financial gain.

Does anyone remember the Labour Party election-campaign lie:
"British jobs for British people"?
Well the greedy elites who dictate the Agenda from behind closed doors went laughing all the way to the bank!

 

Fifty Billion Euro to Throw Away

EU Demands of Britain 50 Billion Euro

EU commissars have just announced that in order to leave the EU, Britain must hand over 50 billion euro to the European Union.

The UK government (England has no parliament) has not said anything to the contrary, and so we may assume that a country with 1.7 trillion pounds of public debt and 1.3 trillion pounds in public pension liabilities will be forced to find 50 billion euro to leave an organization that no British person ever voted to join.

The fact is, we do not have 50 billion euro to hand over, on top of the 58 million pounds that every day is still being handed over to the EU even after the June 2016 Brexit referendum.

In theory, we should have stopped paying 58 million pounds a day to the EU the day after the referendum, when the majority voted to leave.
Instead, we are still paying this sum, and now are being told we have to hand over a lump sum of 50 billion euro too.

Who among us has this money to throw away?
I haven't!

Oh the days when the White Cliffs of Dover were considered the pride and joy of England, a natural defence against foreign invasion!

 

True Democracy

What Is Democracy?

Democracy is the will of the Folk within an administrative boundary.
The boundaries for democracy can be local and national.
In a truly democratic state, the Folk partakes in defining its own present and its own future.

Democracy is meant to be from the Folk for the Folk.
It is not meant to be overruled by elites dictating their agenda from behind closed doors.
The democratic right is not meant to be subdued to the bullying whips of commissars whose function is to impose the will of their masters.

Democracy is expressed through freedom of speech and respect for the right of other people to express their views. It is not meant for abuse, intimidation and bullying.

The objective of a democratic order is to uphold the right of the individual within a society and the right of many individuals within the same society, for the greater good of the community.

The deconstruction of democracy starts with undoing a person's will to partake in society, and it ends with the alienation of many and with distrust in the ruling elites.

Not Democracy but Tyranny

Currently, Britain is ruled by a foreign parliament based in Brussels and by an elite that is sacrificing our interests to the demands of this foreign parliament. 
Being ruled from Brussels means continuous mass immigration to Britain and continuous payment of crippling tributes to foreign countries members of the European Union.

It also means that the will of the Folk has been ignored and replaced with the will of those who wish to submit our Nation to foreign parliament. 
Not our interests, but those of the ruling tyranny are being furthered.

How can we have national democracy when a parliament in Brussels - representing 28 countries - is legislating according to whatever is placed before it by the European Commission?

How can we have democracy when millions of jobs in Britain are being held away from British people and given to eastern Europeans only?

How can we have democracy when the Establishment excludes anyone who meaningfully challenges its established order?