Why I Am a Nationalist

A survey on the Eurometer in June 2016 returned this result:

YOUR CLOSEST FIT:

 

Nationalist

Along with 20% of the UK

 

Nationalists tend to take great pride in the traditions and values of the United Kingdom. They generally think British culture occupies a distinguished position on the global stage. These views mean Nationalists largely want to preserve that culture, and they commonly consider foreign influence as a threat to the national identity and character of the UK.

 

On average, Nationalists are the group that is most opposed to the European Union. Nationalists largely reject links between the UK and continental Europe, and think the EU is damaging to the social and economic prospects of the UK.

 

Nationalists also tend to feel that the EU has imposed a culture of political correctness on the UK, which has infringed on their personal freedoms and liberties. They think the EU has foisted liberal migration policies on the UK, resulting in a large influx of foreigners. Nationalists generally have negative views of those immigrants, tending to think that they exploit the nation’s wealth while being unable or unwilling to integrate into British society.

 

On the economy, Nationalists view the EU as mired in bureaucracy and as a drain on the UK’s resources. They tend to think that the economic policies of the EU have harmed the UK’s prosperity. They generally oppose the EU’s expansion, particularly the admission of countries with relatively weak economies.

 

Unsurprisingly given their general views of the EU, Nationalists are the group most likely to vote to leave in the upcoming referendum.

 

Anglian Cross

 

 

 

Why I Am a Socialist

Social, as Opposed to Anti-Social

Under the term Socialist, I intend social, which is the opposite of anti-social. To understand my point in reference to finance, equate my view "I am a Socialist" to meaning: "I am for a social management of finances within society", and then consider what the opposite would imply: "I am for an anti-social management of finances within society".

 

Then you can understand why I am a Socialist and what is meant by that. It is a principle which is defined by a definition.

 

At the Party

Let us imagine a party has been prepared for the entire community and equate this party to the national economy. Guests turn up, and these are intended as the members of society - the whole nation.

 

All are seated at the tables, and some start helping themselves to the platters, taking 20 or 30 pies at a time, heaping ten plates full of food, and snatching whole cakes. They sit there, quite disgustingly, with so much food they could not eat in one month or even in a year, while others sit there with little left to choose from: half a pie, half a plate of food, a fraction of cake ....

As we can see, the uncouth behaviour that does not go well at the party is an anti-social attitude.

 

The management of the economy must be fair, it must be carried out in favour of all the participants, and there need to be rules on how to distribute the limited resources we have within our economy.

 

 

National Socialism Opposing Extremist Policies

A Sane Economy

The ideals of National Socialism do not allow for an insane distribution of wealth. Instead, the rules of party communion are followed. The folk present at the party are seated at tables, at each place is a candle, and every person partakes in the meal.

 

The food is limited, as is the economy, but everyone present has the right to receive a share in the meal. Each person's appetite is limited, so no-one needs to take more than they can consume, but each participant would like to eat their share.

 

The economy has limited resources, its wealth is not boundless, so it must be managed in a way that allows the citizens to tend to their needs in a just manner. Economic wealth cannot be the object of indiscriminate possession.

 

Extreme Insanity in the Economy

Speculation on house prices in Britain has driven the cost of housing to a level where no-one on a minimum wage could ever afford to buy a house. And perhaps not even on an average wage. How can house prices rise by five to ten percent a year while inflation is at around zero percent, or maybe one percent?

 

As a result of uncontrolled speculative policies, year on year increases in house prices that go way beyond the inflation rate have created a situation whereby to buy a house in Britain today is perhaps three times more expensive than, say, thirty years ago.

 

This is one example of extreme insanity in present day economic policies. And yet there are people living in palaces who own estates and castles and mansions too.

And there are people who earn a top salary of, perhaps, 300,000 pounds a year, such as share company executives, who then slap a one million pound bonus to their annual income. It is not their money but that of the share company, of which they are not the owners.

 

National Socialist Distribution

Can one person come to a party, take up fifteen seats, blow out fifteen candles, and demand as many meals?

In short, no!

But in order to take one seat and keep the candle alight, the participant must be fair to the others who are present.

This is the rule of National Socialist party communion.

 

Once the elites were to take over, the party is over.

It is their very own extreme attitude that brings on the bankruptcy of society.

 

 

National Socialist Food Policy

Ensuring Food for Britain

It is of paramount importance that Britain initiate an urgent food policy to ensure sufficient alimentary reserves for our Country's needs.

 

Currently there is no guarantee that thin-air currencies will be accepted as legal tender in future international trade, or that the international share markets will not crash into oblivion.

Furthermore there is no guarantee that oil supplies will continue towards the West, as warfare is raging in and around areas that supply most of the world's exported oil.

 

National Socialist principles require that the State be prepared to supply enough food to the population in time of urgent need. For this reason, sufficient reserves of agricultural produce would have to be stored in protected places for any unexpected event, whether war, floods, drought or a financial crash, all of which could lead to a collapse in world trade.

 

Investing in agricultural assets both in the form of food reserves and productive farmland has to be a priority in matters of public welfare, in particular considering the precarious situation of current financial and economic affairs at home and abroad and the increasing state of warfare that is spreading through the Middle East and parts of northern Africa.

 

Developers and Their Housing Estates

While developers are assuring us all that we need more people to settle in our lands, and that our farms, woods and green belt must be used to accommodate housing estates for all these masses of people, we need to seriously ask whether these developers are serving our interests.

 

It is not in our interest to be denied a binding referendum on important local issues that would allow the public to oppose unwanted housing estates and therefore unwanted mass migration of people into their area.

 

Precisely for this reason, the Coalition government that was voted into Parliament in 2010 decided to scrap from the Localism Bill the clause concerning a binding referendum on important local issues, so that the public could not legally oppose the developers.

In fact, the Establishment does not serve our interests, but those of the elites who dictate their agenda and impose it on us whether we like it or not.

 

The National Socialist Commitment to our Country

Our Land must be preserved for our common good and for our future generations, and not needlessly sacrificed to those who would simply concrete it over in return for financial gain.

 

We need to ensure that our farmland is protected and productive, and that we have invested our energy into securing sufficient food supplies even in hard times, including all unexpected events.

 

 

Austerity for the Many

The Spiral Nose Dive
For reasons that would appear incomprehensible for anyone a hundred years ago, or indeed one thousand years ago, very fertile countries in the West are gradually introducing a regime of austerity whereby most people are getting poorer all the time.

In the past, large families with many children would make it, whereas today, much smaller families are experiencing constant financial stress, often plagued by debt. Austerity has set in notwithstanding the high level of technology that has enabled farming and manufacturing to produce enormous surpluses of products.

 

In Britain, the minimum hourly wage has passed from around £5.93 to £6.49 in five years. In this same period of time, house prices have increased by around 40%, even though workers' wages on building sites have gone up by only a few percentage points.

 

But Not Bankers Bonuses

By contrast, the top salaries of chief executives of large share companies, including City bankers, have been constantly increased, way beyond the inflation rate. And the absurd annual bonuses that are many times higher than their top salaries have continued to be splashed out in spite of initial public uproar.

 

Indeed, the public doesn't seem to mention bankers' bonuses anymore, as the Establishment, after making a few fiery speeches, simply allowed this insane "bonus" institution to continue.

And so it goes on.

 

Likewise, we still read of tycoons buying up London's top-class residential estate, and we still read how the very privileged and rich are adding more and more to their private assets.

For some people, amassing wealth in times of great financial austerity doesn't seem a problem.

 

Reasons for Austerity

One of the major reasons for state bankruptcy is the building up of a public debt. When the State cuts public spending all the time, as in Britain, this is because the national debt has spiralled out of control. However, even with all the cuts in public spending introduced over the past five years in Britain, the public debt has doubled over the same period, from 750 billion pounds to over 1.5 trillion pounds.
As we can see, the national debt has doubled even with public spending being drastically cut year on year.

 

Clearly, there is nothing the Treasury can do to pull out of the debt spiral, short of introducing a drastic change to the whole economic system. The only one thing the Treasury has managed to do to keep the current system up and running, is to print 375 billion pounds in digital money, called Quantitative Easing. Known as QE, it was introduced in 2009 following the financial crash of the previous year.

 

This fictional money is not printed on paper, as otherwise the pound sterling would have fallen by possibly 90% or more. Its only real purpose is to prolong the system, to allow chief executives to continue individually adding millions of pounds of bonuses to their accounts every year and to make sure that the rich continue getting wealthier.

QE money printing certainly hasn't prevented austerity for the many, nor has it prevented the public debt from more than doubling since 2009.

 

National Socialist Prosperity

Britain's national wealth is not calculated in assets, but in debt, and as such it is not a wealth. The actual wealth is privately owned.

 

Once National Socialist ideals prevail in Britain, our currency shall be supported by national assets.

The work of the individual shall be fairly paid, the Folk shall be relieved of the national debt burden, and unsecured private debts of people in poverty shall be revoked whenever these cannot be paid back.

 

The idea that one person can earn one hundred times more than another person will simply become history, it will no longer be allowed. Our Land is limited, our wealth is limited, our resources are limited.

 

It is time for the Establishment in Britain to pack up and go. Their time is up. We do not require their unjust retribution.

We will become a free people in a Sovereign Land where work is available for us and not for everyone parachuted in from Eastern Europe, and where aid for the poor is given first and foremost to the British people who are in need of it.

 

 

How England Pays Eastern Europe to Remain in the EU

We Pay Them to Come Here

Every day, Britain pays around 58 million pounds to the EU, and only about one third of this money comes back to the UK.

Most of it goes to Eastern European member states.

 

Similarly, other Western countries are also paying enormous sums of money to Eastern European states in order that they remain part of the European Union.

 

Adding to this, Western countries are obliged to allow anyone from Eastern Europe to move to the West and find work as well as claim benefits. Britain is the most generous country in the European Union when it comes to offering jobs and benefits to anyone from other countries.

 

The enormous difference in average wages between the West and the East means that freedom of movement within the EU is largely one sided, namely from East to West.

England is particularly hard hit by this one way situation, as most Eastern Europeans moving to Britain flock over to England.

 

Stop Paying Tributes to Eastern Europe

If England were to stop paying tributes to Eastern Europe, close the borders to cheap labour and also close down the free-for-all benefits system for all and sundry from the East, and if all Britain did the same, many other Western countries would follow suit.

It is a certainty that not one country in the East of Europe would remain a member of the EU.

 

There would be millions of vacant jobs in England for the millions of unemployed local people, our social services would be able to function better, the enormous pressure on housing would fall with a consequent drop in house prices and rent, and there would be more money to go round for the English people.

In short, we would not be handing over our money and our Country in order to maintain Eastern Europe.

 

People living in the East of Europe would learn to live in their own very fertile lands, build houses when they need them, and work in their own factories.

Rather than their governments whinging and demanding that we have to support them, they would learn to support themselves, and it would be about time if they did so.

 

Our English House and Garden

If an Englishman has a mansion, a green lawn and five colourful orchards, surely he doesn't have to go running every day to his neighbour's house demanding access to his bathroom and kitchen, and claiming the right to pitch a tent on his neighbour's lawn and have the sole exclusive rights to enter his orchards!

 

However, our English house and garden appear to be fair game for Eastern Europe, and on top of that we have to pay tens of millions of pounds every day to these countries.

The One Thousand Year Reign

One Thousand Years of England

English National Socialism adheres to our English Christian Flag.

The Christian Faith is the guiding Light for our People and so we must uphold the right of the English Folk to prosper for one thousand years in the coming Reign.

 

The Establishment has progressively eroded the Faith by demolishing churches all over the land or converting these into housing.

Adding to this, atheism has been imposed on the BBC as if it were a truth, even though Britain is by definition a Christian Country in virtue of the Union Jack, which unifies three Christian Flags.

 

The British Broadcasting Corporation is State owned and State funded, and yet it propagates atheism as if that were the official version of the British legal traditions.

However, doing so is contrary to British Law, as can be seen even in the Coronation Oath, which is supposed to uphold the Laws of God as defined in the Scriptures.

 

 

Agenda to Subvert the Christian Faith 

We may well ask ourselves which agenda is behind the progressive subversion of the Christian Faith in our Land and institutions, and to find the answer we would need to do some research.

The question is not whether there is such an agenda - because there definitely is one - but who is running it.

 

Our People are being replaced in our own Land and our Faith is being subverted. Our churches are disappearing and we are being forced into austerity and ever greater public debt.

Who are the people running the agenda that is destroying our right to be a prosperous Folk?

How could we prosper if our very own Christian Flag is at risk of no longer representing us?

 

Does the media sound any alarm bells? Where are the watchmen who should ring the alarm to warn us that we are being oppressed and led into perdition? Indeed, who runs the media?

We need to ask serious questions concerning our national existence, because as it stands now, our very survival is in question.

 

 

We need to ask who the people are that are dictating the agenda behind the scenes and imposing their obscure will over our destiny.

And we need to ask why the Establishment can manage to cover up every scandal and always get away with it. Are they above the Law? Can anyone in England be above the Law? Is it admissible at all for anyone to be beyond the Law?

 

So who are the people within the elites imposing an obscure agenda over the English People? Our churches are being demolished, but we are supposed to pay tens of billions of pounds a year to foreign countries. And we are supposed to finance the mass immigration that replaces the English People in our own Land.

 

Our birthright is being taken away from us and we are allowing our inheritance to be demolished or given away.

Or are we protesting against this theft? For if we fail to do so, we cannot aspire to the One Thousand Year Reign, and then our English Flag will have failed, along with the English Folk.