England, a Country With No Parliament

Our Destiny Has Been Decided Against Us

England is the only country in the world with no national administrative representation. We have no elected MPs who serve the interests of England. We have no parliament.

We have no say in our own future.

 

The terrible consequences for a country with no elected parliament can be seen in our current situation: we are ruled by an alien dictatorship to whom we must pay financial tributes and which dictates law unto us. We voted in a referendum to subtract our Land and Folk from this tyranny, but the result has been denied us, and there is no parliament that will speak up for our rights to sovereignty.

 

The Scottish Parliament

Scotland has a parliament, it has elected ministers that serve therein for the interests of the Scots, and this parliament has blocked Britain's exit from the EU owing to an alliance between the Scottish National Party (SNP) and the UK government.

 

The website of the Scottish Parliament states that the EU referendum that took place in June 2016 was not legally binding for England, or for Britain as a union.

 

From the Scottish Parliament's website:

Following the EU Referendum –

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the EU referendum result legally binding?

The EU referendum was advisory and not legally binding. As such, the outcome of the referendum does not in itself have any legal effect.

So, the EU referendum is being presented as not legally binding.

Democracy fell short and tyranny prevailed.

 

Theresa May: No Brexit!

After David Cameron of the Conservative party resigned as UK prime minister soon after the EU referendum, Theresa May, from the same party, was voted in the UK parliament as prime minister.

 

She later stated that Scotland had voted to remain in the EU, and the Scottish parliament made clear that they could veto Britain's exit from this alien institution. And whereas many English people sincerely believed the referendum on exiting the European Union was legally binding, the Scottish Parliament made clear that it was not.

 

The Scottish Parliament's website goes on to clarify that Article 50 of the EU constitution is needed to exit the European Union:

 

From the Scottish Parliament's website:

What is Article 50?

1. Any Member State may decide to withdraw from the (European) Union in accordance with its own constitutional requirements.

2. A Member State which decides to withdraw shall notify the European Council of its intention (by invoking Article 50).

 

Theresa May decided to apply the constitutional requirements of the Scottish Parliament and said that she will not invoke Article 50. She said that she has no clue how Brexit could happen and has been travelling around Europe repeating this to many governments there. This is because those European countries each have their own parliament and government, as too does Scotland.

 

England has no parliament, so she said to us there will be no Brexit and no invoking of Article 50 this year.

And as we English have no national assembly or parliament that can simply declare our Sovereignty from foreign governments, all we are doing is sitting around waiting for these European governments - who Theresa May is pandering to - to make their next decision over our Folk and Land.

 

The Scottish Parliament website goes on to explain:

3. The (EU) Treaties shall cease to apply to the State in question (which decides to leave through Article 50) from the date of entry into force of the withdrawal agreement or, failing that, two years after the notification referred to in paragraph 2 (Article 50), unless the European Council, in agreement with the Member State concerned, unanimously decides to extend this period.

 

But Theresa May will not invoke Article 50.

And why would anyone have cause to believe she would ever invoke Article 50 considering that - going by the Scottish Parliament's statement - she does not even consider the EU referendum as legally binding?

 

England's Freedom From Alien Rule

The destiny of our Nation cannot be kicked down the road into the remote future, we cannot be held in a state of uncertainty by a prime minister who has regard for the Scottish Parliament and for European parliaments but refuses to heed the will of the English Folk.

 

We cannot be deprived of our right to an English parliament that administers to our needs and that works for our prosperity. We need our own elected MPs who will implement the popular mandate that was expressed in the EU referendum, whereby the majority of the English voted to leave the EU.

 

We do not need someone who openly says they do not have a clue how Brexit would work and has no intention of initiating talks to bring Britain out of the EU. Someone who does not even consider the EU referendum as legally binding. Someone who only wants to kick the can down the road and let the years sail by as more and more people come flocking over to our Country and we pay every day £58 million to the EU so this can be inflicted upon us. We are paying to be eaten up alive.

 

So if Scotland voted to remain in the EU, England voted to leave. The SNP is present in the Scottish Parliament and at Westminster, and they have an agreement with Theresa May to render null and void England's popular mandate to exit the EU.

And we English have no parliament and no say in the matter.

 

Our future is in National Socialist England, sovereign and free from alien rule.

 

 

England Voted to Leave the EU

Popular Mandate for Sovereignty

In June 2016, England voted to leave the EU. The EU referendum result was a mandate from the English Folk to achieve sovereignty from the alien EU Commission and from the EU parliament that decides solely upon motions laid before it by this same dictatorial Commission.

 

Representatives of the Scottish National Party keep reminding the world that Scotland voted to remain in the European Union, and as a result, the UK prime minister, Theresa May, has stated that Britain cannot initiate any moves at all to exit the EU this year, citing the SNP's stance.

In fact she has only one intention, and that is to leave England's destiny in limbo and block the majority will of the English People, forcing us to remain subdued indefinitely to an alien dictatorship.

 

The democratic mandate expressed by the majority of England has been overturned and now we find ourselves without a national parliament representing our desire for sovereignty from the alien and oppressive EU dictatorship.

 

Worthless Words

There is no guarantee that Theresa May will ever aim for Brexit, we have no cause to believe her while she refuses to implement the referendum result. If she was sincere, she'd have already started serious discussions on halting free movement from Europe to Britain and on halting any further payments of money from Britain to the EU.

 

Putting an end to unwanted immigration and to enforced payments of tributes to a foreign dictatorship is an essential requirement and should be accomplished immediately.

Starting talks on the redefining of trade agreements should also be considered of importance in order to safeguard the economy.

 

What we hear, though, is an admission that she has no idea whatsoever how to go about it and has no intention of doing anything to bring it about. And this admission may as well be considered as counting not only for this year, but for next year and the year after and the year after that.

 

England Cannot Wait

We the English Folk do not have any cause or reason to continue allowing our borders to be held wide open to half the world and its wife and dog. We have no reason to continue seeing our money handed over to an alien dictatorship so that they can hand it on to eastern European governments who are incapable of looking after their own countries' affairs, who take our money while sending their masses of unemployed over to our Country to get our jobs.

 

We the English Folk have a God-given right to our own English Parliament, to elect our own English MPs specifically to administer to the affairs of our own Folk and Country.

We do not need to be trodden down any longer by failed eastern European governments whose only intention is to exploit our economy and Country for their own ends.

 

We have a popular mandate to obtain sovereignty from the failed EU dictatorship, but we have no English parliament that can bring this mandate to fruition.

 

 

Sovereign England

An English Parliament

England does not have a parliament and so we have no elected English MPs in a parliament that serves the interests of England.

We need a parliament that, on elected, pledges Allegiance to the English Folk. No swearing of allegiance to a private family member or to the elites who operate in dark circles and impose an obscure agenda over our Folk.

 

No Alien EU Commission or EU Parliament to Rule England 

England cannot be subjected to an alien authority and therefore cannot be a member of the European Union.

The majority of English people do not want our Homeland to be subjugated to the EU and have expressed this will in a recent referendum that has been overruled by the UK Establishment.

 

No War with Russia

We do not need or want a war with Russia, we do not want people plotting a future conflict between England and Russia, we do not want to build or purchase nuclear weapons that are specifically meant to confront the Russian Federation.

 

We do not want to bring about self destruction by being dragged at the behest of obscure elitist circles into a war against a country that does not threaten or invade us, but that could inflict unimaginable damage on us if we allowed people to spark off a conflict with that country, in particular people who threaten to use nuclear weapons.

 

 

The EU Referendum: Is it Legally Binding?

Playing with Fire

It is now dawning on the people in Britain that perhaps the June 2016 EU referendum has no legal significance for parliament.

Millions of people have signed a petition to overrule the result, and ministers are stating that the result should be declared void.

 

The petition asking for a repeat of the referendum has no legal base and for this reason it should have been rejected, but instead, it will be debated in parliament.

This petition, that currently has over four million signatures, is asking for the majority result in a referendum to be declared void on the grounds that a majority is not enough.

 

Rather than reject the petition's point as legally unfounded, parliament has declared that it will accept the petition and debate upon it. Democracy has been put into question, and the elected ministers are thus encouraging people to believe that the referendum result may in fact be outlawed.

 

So, going by this same purported logic, why should the election of these same ministers in parliament be honoured?

They heed not the majority will of the people even while claiming to have been voted in by the people.

 

Parliament's Allegiance Is not towards the Folk

We need to understand that the UK parliament does not pledge allegiance to the Folk, but to a private family member.

There is no constitutional guarantee that the elected ministers will serve the people, instead they serve the system of the elites, which is what they swear an oath of allegiance to.

 

They have no problem in delegating authority to an alien parliament in Brussels and to an alien EU Commission that is to all effect a dictatorship. This is because the Agenda which prevails in Britain comes from secretive circles, such as from the Bilderberg Group, and it is based on the Coudenhove-Kalergi plan.

 

This same Agenda is followed by the dictators running the EU, therefore these like-minded people flock to a feather when they delegate power to each other, because their aims are identical: the implementation of the Coudenhove-Kalergi plan to overthrow the Nation States of Britain and Europe and replace the indigenous people with a new race.

These are the real race-haters.

 

National Socialist Defiance

The Spirit of National Socialism will not surrender to those whose aim is to implement genocide of the rightful Folk.

They have bankrupted our society through the debt-based usury system and the public debt, and they have finally outlawed democracy by making clear that they do not abide by the result of the EU referendum.

 

National Socialism is the only ideology that upholds the right of the Folk to be sovereign in its own Homeland.

There is no other ideology that can assure our existence and our freedom. Indeed, many parties are dedicated to the substitution of the rightful people through economic hardships and mass immigration - which we must also pay for! These are the ones who deny democracy and impose tyranny, as is now so blatantly obvious.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_KtoKsT6fLI

 

 

Why I Am a Nationalist

A survey on the Eurometer in June 2016 returned this result:

YOUR CLOSEST FIT:

 

Nationalist

Along with 20% of the UK

 

Nationalists tend to take great pride in the traditions and values of the United Kingdom. They generally think British culture occupies a distinguished position on the global stage. These views mean Nationalists largely want to preserve that culture, and they commonly consider foreign influence as a threat to the national identity and character of the UK.

 

On average, Nationalists are the group that is most opposed to the European Union. Nationalists largely reject links between the UK and continental Europe, and think the EU is damaging to the social and economic prospects of the UK.

 

Nationalists also tend to feel that the EU has imposed a culture of political correctness on the UK, which has infringed on their personal freedoms and liberties. They think the EU has foisted liberal migration policies on the UK, resulting in a large influx of foreigners. Nationalists generally have negative views of those immigrants, tending to think that they exploit the nation’s wealth while being unable or unwilling to integrate into British society.

 

On the economy, Nationalists view the EU as mired in bureaucracy and as a drain on the UK’s resources. They tend to think that the economic policies of the EU have harmed the UK’s prosperity. They generally oppose the EU’s expansion, particularly the admission of countries with relatively weak economies.

 

Unsurprisingly given their general views of the EU, Nationalists are the group most likely to vote to leave in the upcoming referendum.

 

Anglian Cross

 

 

 

Why I Am a Socialist

Social, as Opposed to Anti-Social

Under the term Socialist, I intend social, which is the opposite of anti-social. To understand my point in reference to finance, equate my view "I am a Socialist" to meaning: "I am for a social management of finances within society", and then consider what the opposite would imply: "I am for an anti-social management of finances within society".

 

Then you can understand why I am a Socialist and what is meant by that. It is a principle which is defined by a definition.

 

At the Party

Let us imagine a party has been prepared for the entire community and equate this party to the national economy. Guests turn up, and these are intended as the members of society - the whole nation.

 

All are seated at the tables, and some start helping themselves to the platters, taking 20 or 30 pies at a time, heaping ten plates full of food, and snatching whole cakes. They sit there, quite disgustingly, with so much food they could not eat in one month or even in a year, while others sit there with little left to choose from: half a pie, half a plate of food, a fraction of cake ....

As we can see, the uncouth behaviour that does not go well at the party is an anti-social attitude.

 

The management of the economy must be fair, it must be carried out in favour of all the participants, and there need to be rules on how to distribute the limited resources we have within our economy.

 

 

National Socialism Opposing Extremist Policies

A Sane Economy

The ideals of National Socialism do not allow for an insane distribution of wealth. Instead, the rules of party communion are followed. The folk present at the party are seated at tables, at each place is a candle, and every person partakes in the meal.

 

The food is limited, as is the economy, but everyone present has the right to receive a share in the meal. Each person's appetite is limited, so no-one needs to take more than they can consume, but each participant would like to eat their share.

 

The economy has limited resources, its wealth is not boundless, so it must be managed in a way that allows the citizens to tend to their needs in a just manner. Economic wealth cannot be the object of indiscriminate possession.

 

Extreme Insanity in the Economy

Speculation on house prices in Britain has driven the cost of housing to a level where no-one on a minimum wage could ever afford to buy a house. And perhaps not even on an average wage. How can house prices rise by five to ten percent a year while inflation is at around zero percent, or maybe one percent?

 

As a result of uncontrolled speculative policies, year on year increases in house prices that go way beyond the inflation rate have created a situation whereby to buy a house in Britain today is perhaps three times more expensive than, say, thirty years ago.

 

This is one example of extreme insanity in present day economic policies. And yet there are people living in palaces who own estates and castles and mansions too.

And there are people who earn a top salary of, perhaps, 300,000 pounds a year, such as share company executives, who then slap a one million pound bonus to their annual income. It is not their money but that of the share company, of which they are not the owners.

 

National Socialist Distribution

Can one person come to a party, take up fifteen seats, blow out fifteen candles, and demand as many meals?

In short, no!

But in order to take one seat and keep the candle alight, the participant must be fair to the others who are present.

This is the rule of National Socialist party communion.

 

Once the elites were to take over, the party is over.

It is their very own extreme attitude that brings on the bankruptcy of society.