Secret Elites Undermining Homogeneous Society

UN Working to Destroy Ethnicity

In June 2012, the BBC announced that the United Nation's special representative for migration, Peter Sutherland, had stated that the European Union should "do its best to undermine the homogeneity" of its member states.

 

In fact, in reference to each individual country that is coerced into being subject to the European Union, Peter Sutherland stated that the people "still nurse a sense of our homogeneity and difference from others, and that's precisely what the European Union, in my view, should be doing its best to undermine".

 

The BBC article went on to explain that Peter Sutherland attended meetings of the Bilderberg Group, describing this subversive circle as "a top level international networking organisation often criticised for its alleged secrecy".

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-18519395

 

According to Wikipedia, "Sutherland strongly advocates liberal immigration policies and mass unrestricted immigration into the European Union".

Wikipedia also notes that "he is silent on the immigration policies of other regions". The reason for this is not surprising, as many countries in the world have no policy at all in favour of mass immigration but actively prevent it in order to preserve their social identity.

 

And Wikipedia confirms the existence of an active policy to undermine society in Britain and Europe, noting that according to Sutherland: "the European Union should be doing its best to undermine any sense of our homogeneity and difference from others".

　

National Socialist Folk and Homeland

National Socialism is the only ideology that upholds the inherent right of the people to their own homland.

Transparency within a National Socialist country cannot allow for subversive elites to secretly scheme and plot and undermine society.

 

Enacting legislation from dark corners - such as the Bilderberg Group - and outside of a democratic mandate is inevitably the stab in the back which brings ruination upon a homogeneous society.

The folk is lied to, deceived, and made to pay for its own demise in order to be substituted by a new race. And as people would not vote for this, the agenda is imposed against our will.

 

This is one of the reasons why Brexit is being kicked down the road and Britain's borders are still wide open to mass immigration, with the prospect of nothing changing until a new referendum is held in several years time with a majority remain vote once the demographics have changed even more to the disadvantage of the indigenous folk.

 

An English Parliament

We need an English Parliament that will assure England's Sovereignty and forever free us from the power of the secretive elites who plot and scheme for our demise.

 

We do not have to pay one penny to the European Union and we do not have to keep our borders forced open to unwanted immigration.

And we do not need race quotas enforced on us in our own Country discriminating against the English on account of the colour of our skin. We do not have to tolerate the UK Race Laws that enable people to make us feel guilty for being English and exclude us from the right to work in our own homeland.

 

We have the God-given right to our own English parliament and one of its first acts should be to abolish the Race Laws that are being used to discriminate against indigenous English people because of the colour of our skin.

Otherwise, with each passing year, the Race Quotas will be changed in order to reduce the percentage of work places that can be given to ethnically English people, until one day we become a minority while having paid for it through taxes, public debt and unemployment.

 

The majority of English people voted to leave the EU in June 2016, but this democratic vote has been to all effect wiped off the table. In fact, nothing is happening to implement our democratic will.

 

 

Race Is Enshrined in English Law

Race Relations Act

In 1965, legislation was introduced to define relations between different races in the United Kingdom. The Race Relations Act was updated in 1968, and again in 1976, and once more in the year 2000 with the Race Relations Amendment Act 2000.

The Race Relations laws have since been incorporated in the Equality Act 2010.

 

As around 98% of immigration to Britain is centred in England, the Race Laws mostly affect England.

Before the advent of the Race Laws, people in England did not know that the colour of our skin would become relevant in legislation. We never had an issue owing to the colour of our skin. We needed no legislation that placed the spotlight on our skin's colour.

 

"Male, Pale and Stale"

A former member of the Black Police Association described the MET (Metropolitan Police of Greater London) as coming across as "male, pale and stale".

And Sadiq Khan, shortly before becoming Mayor of London, announced he was prepared to campaign for a change in the law to reduce the number of ethnically English people who can join the local Police Force in London.

 

In an article dated 24 July 2015, the Independent states that Sadiq Khan will call for affirmative action to change the status of the London Police Force, even to the point of calling for legislation "introducing quotas to alter the RACIAL balance of the force".

 

As we can see, England is particularly affected by the Race Laws, much more than any of the other constituent countries of the Union, and the implications of these laws are stacked against the indigenous folk.

 

So long as these Race Laws exist in England, the introduction of law-enforced race quotas is always going to be among us and it will always be in a polemical manner. The indigenous people are going to be confronted year on year with an ever dwindling percentage of Race Quota work opportunities, and we will each and every time be made to feel guilty about it.

 

Article from the Independent 24 July 2015:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/sadiq-khan-i-will-back-introduction-of-a-quota-system-for-black-officers-in-met-police-10414872.html

 

 

English Ethnic Identity

Anglo-Celtic

The English are Anglo-Celtic. The name Anglo is from the Angles who gave their name to England and refers more generally to the Saxons and the Jutes too.

The name Celtic is from the Celts that inhabited Britain at the time of the arrival of these three Teutonic tribes and who in many areas integrated with them.

 

In Britain, people are at times asked to state their ethnic or racial identity when filling in forms. On these forms, the ethnic term English is often substituted with the more racially sounding option White British.

The latter refers to a wider racial definition, as in belonging to the British Race, whereas the former denotes the specifically English ethnicity that is part of this race.

 

Whereas the census in England gives the option to describe oneself as ethnically English, forms from other offices tend to offer the term White British. On some forms there is the option to describe oneself only as White, referring to a much broader racial definition that goes beyond being ethnically British.

 

As we have seen, the official wording used in the identification of the indigenous population living in England makes reference to both race and ethnicity. Some people prefer to identify along racial lines, others along ethnic lines, but there is a grey area between the two.

 

The major ethnic difference between the English and the other indigenous populations of the British Isles is that these latter are more generally of Celtic stock. Even then, in England there are some areas where the local population has almost entirely Celtic roots, as in Cornwall.

 

Race and Ethnicity

The term race can have a specifically tribal connotation, such as belonging to the Angles, Saxons, Jutes or other Teutonic tribes, or to one or more Celtic groups.

In this sense, the term Anglo-Celtic is the correct definition for the English, considering that the word Anglo indicates the various Teutonic tribes that moved to parts of Britain and settled among the Celts, or at least among those Celts who remained in what later became England.

 

Genetic identification through tribal origin gives the closest fit to racial identity, whereby the reference is to one or more tribes belonging to the same original ethnic folk.

In this sense, Angles, Saxons and Jutes are part of the original Teutonic folk, while Scots, Welsh and Irish are largely part of the original Celtic folk.

 

The terms racial and ethnic can even be interchangeable, as seen when referring to an original folk from which different tribes descend speaking similar languages and having a similar culture.

Ethnicity in fact is defined not only by racial origins, but also cultural and linguistic characteristics that have accumulated over centuries and even millennia.

 

In England, the prevalence of the English language over the Celtic led to the use of the term Anglo-Saxon in reference to the English.

However, the term Anglo-Celtic is the correct description of both our English and our British origin as we descend from Teutonic tribes and from the Celtic Britons.

In essence, though, Anglo-Celtic and Anglo-Saxon both correspond to being English.

 

The British are racially akin to northern and western Europeans owing to common Teutonic and Celtic roots.

Due to this racial and ethnic affinity, English people look favourably at the concept of union with the other indigenous populations of the British Isles: the Scots, the Welsh and the Irish, and are generally inclined to favour close economic and cultural ties to northern and western Europe.

 

Nationalists that are racially aware tend to consider wars fought between nations of similar racial background as brother wars rather than as patriotic confrontations.

They see such wars as a net loss to the overall cause of racial nationalism and consider the elitist circles to be the instigators. World bankers and politicians are often identified as being responsible for plotting conflicts between brethren nations.

 

 

England, a Country With No Parliament

Our Destiny Has Been Decided Against Us

England is the only country in the world with no national administrative representation. We have no elected MPs who serve the interests of England. We have no parliament.

We have no say in our own future.

 

The terrible consequences for a country with no elected parliament can be seen in our current situation: we are ruled by an alien dictatorship to whom we must pay financial tributes and which dictates law unto us. We voted in a referendum to subtract our Land and Folk from this tyranny, but the result has been denied us, and there is no parliament that will speak up for our rights to sovereignty.

 

The Scottish Parliament

Scotland has a parliament, it has elected ministers that serve therein for the interests of the Scots, and this parliament has blocked Britain's exit from the EU owing to an alliance between the Scottish National Party (SNP) and the UK government.

 

The website of the Scottish Parliament states that the EU referendum that took place in June 2016 was not legally binding for England, or for Britain as a union.

 

From the Scottish Parliament's website:

Following the EU Referendum –

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the EU referendum result legally binding?

The EU referendum was advisory and not legally binding. As such, the outcome of the referendum does not in itself have any legal effect.

So, the EU referendum is being presented as not legally binding.

Democracy fell short and tyranny prevailed.

 

Theresa May: No Brexit!

After David Cameron of the Conservative party resigned as UK prime minister soon after the EU referendum, Theresa May, from the same party, was voted in the UK parliament as prime minister.

 

She later stated that Scotland had voted to remain in the EU, and the Scottish parliament made clear that they could veto Britain's exit from this alien institution. And whereas many English people sincerely believed the referendum on exiting the European Union was legally binding, the Scottish Parliament made clear that it was not.

 

The Scottish Parliament's website goes on to clarify that Article 50 of the EU constitution is needed to exit the European Union:

 

From the Scottish Parliament's website:

What is Article 50?

1. Any Member State may decide to withdraw from the (European) Union in accordance with its own constitutional requirements.

2. A Member State which decides to withdraw shall notify the European Council of its intention (by invoking Article 50).

 

Theresa May decided to apply the constitutional requirements of the Scottish Parliament and said that she will not invoke Article 50. She said that she has no clue how Brexit could happen and has been travelling around Europe repeating this to many governments there. This is because those European countries each have their own parliament and government, as too does Scotland.

 

England has no parliament, so she said to us there will be no Brexit and no invoking of Article 50 this year.

And as we English have no national assembly or parliament that can simply declare our Sovereignty from foreign governments, all we are doing is sitting around waiting for these European governments - who Theresa May is pandering to - to make their next decision over our Folk and Land.

 

The Scottish Parliament website goes on to explain:

3. The (EU) Treaties shall cease to apply to the State in question (which decides to leave through Article 50) from the date of entry into force of the withdrawal agreement or, failing that, two years after the notification referred to in paragraph 2 (Article 50), unless the European Council, in agreement with the Member State concerned, unanimously decides to extend this period.

 

But Theresa May will not invoke Article 50.

And why would anyone have cause to believe she would ever invoke Article 50 considering that - going by the Scottish Parliament's statement - she does not even consider the EU referendum as legally binding?

 

England's Freedom From Alien Rule

The destiny of our Nation cannot be kicked down the road into the remote future, we cannot be held in a state of uncertainty by a prime minister who has regard for the Scottish Parliament and for European parliaments but refuses to heed the will of the English Folk.

 

We cannot be deprived of our right to an English parliament that administers to our needs and that works for our prosperity. We need our own elected MPs who will implement the popular mandate that was expressed in the EU referendum, whereby the majority of the English voted to leave the EU.

 

We do not need someone who openly says they do not have a clue how Brexit would work and has no intention of initiating talks to bring Britain out of the EU. Someone who does not even consider the EU referendum as legally binding. Someone who only wants to kick the can down the road and let the years sail by as more and more people come flocking over to our Country and we pay every day £58 million to the EU so this can be inflicted upon us. We are paying to be eaten up alive.

 

So if Scotland voted to remain in the EU, England voted to leave. The SNP is present in the Scottish Parliament and at Westminster, and they have an agreement with Theresa May to render null and void England's popular mandate to exit the EU.

And we English have no parliament and no say in the matter.

 

Our future is in National Socialist England, sovereign and free from alien rule.

 

 

England Voted to Leave the EU

Popular Mandate for Sovereignty

In June 2016, England voted to leave the EU. The EU referendum result was a mandate from the English Folk to achieve sovereignty from the alien EU Commission and from the EU parliament that decides solely upon motions laid before it by this same dictatorial Commission.

 

Representatives of the Scottish National Party keep reminding the world that Scotland voted to remain in the European Union, and as a result, the UK prime minister, Theresa May, has stated that Britain cannot initiate any moves at all to exit the EU this year, citing the SNP's stance.

In fact she has only one intention, and that is to leave England's destiny in limbo and block the majority will of the English People, forcing us to remain subdued indefinitely to an alien dictatorship.

 

The democratic mandate expressed by the majority of England has been overturned and now we find ourselves without a national parliament representing our desire for sovereignty from the alien and oppressive EU dictatorship.

 

Worthless Words

There is no guarantee that Theresa May will ever aim for Brexit, we have no cause to believe her while she refuses to implement the referendum result. If she was sincere, she'd have already started serious discussions on halting free movement from Europe to Britain and on halting any further payments of money from Britain to the EU.

 

Putting an end to unwanted immigration and to enforced payments of tributes to a foreign dictatorship is an essential requirement and should be accomplished immediately.

Starting talks on the redefining of trade agreements should also be considered of importance in order to safeguard the economy.

 

What we hear, though, is an admission that she has no idea whatsoever how to go about it and has no intention of doing anything to bring it about. And this admission may as well be considered as counting not only for this year, but for next year and the year after and the year after that.

 

England Cannot Wait

We the English Folk do not have any cause or reason to continue allowing our borders to be held wide open to half the world and its wife and dog. We have no reason to continue seeing our money handed over to an alien dictatorship so that they can hand it on to eastern European governments who are incapable of looking after their own countries' affairs, who take our money while sending their masses of unemployed over to our Country to get our jobs.

 

We the English Folk have a God-given right to our own English Parliament, to elect our own English MPs specifically to administer to the affairs of our own Folk and Country.

We do not need to be trodden down any longer by failed eastern European governments whose only intention is to exploit our economy and Country for their own ends.

 

We have a popular mandate to obtain sovereignty from the failed EU dictatorship, but we have no English parliament that can bring this mandate to fruition.

 

 

Sovereign England

An English Parliament

England does not have a parliament and so we have no elected English MPs in a parliament that serves the interests of England.

We need a parliament that, on elected, pledges Allegiance to the English Folk. No swearing of allegiance to a private family member or to the elites who operate in dark circles and impose an obscure agenda over our Folk.

 

No Alien EU Commission or EU Parliament to Rule England 

England cannot be subjected to an alien authority and therefore cannot be a member of the European Union.

The majority of English people do not want our Homeland to be subjugated to the EU and have expressed this will in a recent referendum that has been overruled by the UK Establishment.

 

No War with Russia

We do not need or want a war with Russia, we do not want people plotting a future conflict between England and Russia, we do not want to build or purchase nuclear weapons that are specifically meant to confront the Russian Federation.

 

We do not want to bring about self destruction by being dragged at the behest of obscure elitist circles into a war against a country that does not threaten or invade us, but that could inflict unimaginable damage on us if we allowed people to spark off a conflict with that country, in particular people who threaten to use nuclear weapons.

 

 

The EU Referendum: Is it Legally Binding?

Playing with Fire

It is now dawning on the people in Britain that perhaps the June 2016 EU referendum has no legal significance for parliament.

Millions of people have signed a petition to overrule the result, and ministers are stating that the result should be declared void.

 

The petition asking for a repeat of the referendum has no legal base and for this reason it should have been rejected, but instead, it will be debated in parliament.

This petition, that currently has over four million signatures, is asking for the majority result in a referendum to be declared void on the grounds that a majority is not enough.

 

Rather than reject the petition's point as legally unfounded, parliament has declared that it will accept the petition and debate upon it. Democracy has been put into question, and the elected ministers are thus encouraging people to believe that the referendum result may in fact be outlawed.

 

So, going by this same purported logic, why should the election of these same ministers in parliament be honoured?

They heed not the majority will of the people even while claiming to have been voted in by the people.

 

Parliament's Allegiance Is not towards the Folk

We need to understand that the UK parliament does not pledge allegiance to the Folk, but to a private family member.

There is no constitutional guarantee that the elected ministers will serve the people, instead they serve the system of the elites, which is what they swear an oath of allegiance to.

 

They have no problem in delegating authority to an alien parliament in Brussels and to an alien EU Commission that is to all effect a dictatorship. This is because the Agenda which prevails in Britain comes from secretive circles, such as from the Bilderberg Group, and it is based on the Coudenhove-Kalergi plan.

 

This same Agenda is followed by the dictators running the EU, therefore these like-minded people flock to a feather when they delegate power to each other, because their aims are identical: the implementation of the Coudenhove-Kalergi plan to overthrow the Nation States of Britain and Europe and replace the indigenous people with a new race.

These are the real race-haters.

 

National Socialist Defiance

The Spirit of National Socialism will not surrender to those whose aim is to implement genocide of the rightful Folk.

They have bankrupted our society through the debt-based usury system and the public debt, and they have finally outlawed democracy by making clear that they do not abide by the result of the EU referendum.

 

National Socialism is the only ideology that upholds the right of the Folk to be sovereign in its own Homeland.

There is no other ideology that can assure our existence and our freedom. Indeed, many parties are dedicated to the substitution of the rightful people through economic hardships and mass immigration - which we must also pay for! These are the ones who deny democracy and impose tyranny, as is now so blatantly obvious.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_KtoKsT6fLI